Arrow Highway Bikeway
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Arrow Highway bikeway cost-sharing with Pomona→At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Nov 2, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Thanked the council for the Arrow Highway funding and cost-sharing with Pomona, saving taxpayers over $200,000, and urged extending the protected bike lane from the Gold Line station toward downtown businesses and residences.
City Council (Regular) - Nov 2, 2026 · 36:36 →Thanked staff for walking the site with her; the dedicated right-turn lane fixes her January merging concern and she supports moving forward.
City Council (Regular) - Apr 6, 2026 · 2:15:00 →Called the design 'idiotic' — a bike lane to nowhere that will funnel 50-75 cyclists into conflicts, and worried about e-bike kids.
City Council (Regular) - Apr 6, 2026 · 2:28:15 →A cycling parent who commutes by bike — fully supports the protected two-way path and urged a fixed curb barrier, not just flex posts.
City Council (Regular) - Apr 6, 2026 · 2:19:15 →Supports the bikeway and repaving but flagged rush-hour backups where three lanes funnel to two, and urged protecting the recently upgraded medians.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 20, 2026 · 1:42:00 →Questioned the data justifying extending the bike lane past White Avenue, calling the traffic mix there dangerous and asking to see the study.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 20, 2026 · 1:43:30 →Said Arrow is already a mess, questioned the $528K cost cap, and asked where LA's Olympics contribution is — warned the city could end up unable to drive anywhere.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 20, 2026 · 1:44:59 →Said the road surface is terrible and questioned ending the bike lane at White, suggesting D Street or connections to Bonita would make more sense.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 20, 2026 · 1:47:00 →