Civic Issues

Topics getting the most attention in East Palo Alto public meetings, ranked by how frequently they are discussed.

Filtered to Development
Filtered to Critical
Filtered to 6m

4 issues in development with critical priority

CriticalDevelopment

Woodland Park inclusionary housing compliance

The council rejected an ordinance that would have exempted projects of 20 units or fewer from inclusionary housing requirements until the countywide nexus study is complete. Opponents said it would permanently lose about 17 affordable homes and $2 million in fees; supporters argued the requirements make small projects impossible to build. The issue will return when the study concludes in 2027.

7 mentions (2 this month)Last discussed Nov 10, 2026
CriticalDevelopment

Affordable housing at 2120-2160 Euclid Avenue

The council approved the inclusionary housing plan for a 430-unit, 100%-affordable project tied to the Ravenswood School District, with about 195 units under local hiring preference and a developer commitment to deepen discounts on ten units to 50% AMI or below.

3 mentionsLast discussed Sep 1, 2026
CriticalDevelopment

Woodland Park Euclid housing project amendment

Sand Hill wants changes to its deal to build 550 units (160 rent-stabilized) on Euclid, including paying $12M toward Ravenswood School District's 430-unit affordable teacher housing instead of building 78 off-site units. Council wants a better price before approving.

6 mentionsLast discussed Jul 21, 2026
CriticalDevelopment

Housing Element Progress and Market-Rate Housing Shortfall

The city is at 27% of its 829-unit state housing target, doing well on low-income units but far behind on moderate and market-rate housing. Dinan argued the shortfall costs the city millions in property tax and drives up rents; others countered that inclusionary requirements and affordable housing subsidies are essential to prevent displacement.

6 mentionsLast discussed Jul 21, 2026