Housing Element Progress and Market-Rate Housing Shortfall
Summary
The city is at 27% of its 829-unit state housing target, doing well on low-income units but far behind on moderate and market-rate housing. Dinan argued the shortfall costs the city millions in property tax and drives up rents; others countered that inclusionary requirements and affordable housing subsidies are essential to prevent displacement.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 21, 2026.
Impact analysis
Dinan estimates millions in forgone annual property tax revenue from unbuilt market-rate units.
Residents gaining affordable units — the city has exceeded its low-income housing target so far.
Middle-income residents priced out by the moderate and market-rate housing shortfall.
Mentions & discussions (2)
City Council - Jul 21, 2026
The council rejected an ordinance that would have exempted projects of 20 units or fewer from inclusionary housing requirements until the countywide nexus study is complete. Opponents said it would permanently lose about 17 affordable homes and $2 million in fees; supporters argued the requirements make small projects impossible to build. The issue will return when the study concludes in 2027.
City Council - Mar 17, 2026
The city is at 27% of its 829-unit state housing target, doing well on low-income units but far behind on moderate and market-rate housing. Dinan argued the shortfall costs the city millions in property tax and drives up rents; others countered that inclusionary requirements and affordable housing subsidies are essential to prevent displacement.
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for East Palo Alto
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.