Measure I

Invited supporters to march with the Yes on Measure I group in the Windsor Day Parade and shared the campaign's website and contact information.

A concerned citizen (and Senior Center commissioner) read the measure's 'until ended by the voters' language and argued no sunset date removes pressure to fix the structural deficit, citing Santa Rosa's repeat tax measures.

Urged residents to attend the town hall and look to the town's educational materials, saying Measure I secures Windsor's future amid shrinking federal and state dollars and coming storm costs.

Cited a new study on California poverty and daily costs, called the sales tax regressive, and questioned why the measure has no sunset, saying the deficit should be fixable in a finite period.

Announced the launch of the Yes on I 4 Windsor campaign website and urged residents to sign up for lawn signs and walk in the Windsor Day Parade to protect town services.

Announced the No on I campaign's launch, ordered yard signs, and said her group of concerned citizens wants the town to thrive with accountability and transparency.

Chair of the Yes on Measure I committee, she cited the town's $6 million in cuts, $5 million in deferred maintenance, and a projected $8-10 million shortfall, urging support for the measure's $5.7 million annual revenue.

Argued the town hasn't been fiscally responsible — the business license fee hasn't been updated since 2012 despite a promise to fix it by July — so she supports a No vote to force wiser spending.

The market owner argued communities work when everyone pays for shared things like fire protection and schools, and urged residents to consider what kind of Windsor they want — without telling anyone how to vote on Measure I.