ZIP program
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Zoning Improvement Program for Housing (ZIP)→At a glance
- Public comments
- 4
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 16, 2026.
Public comments (5)
A 20-year resident who demanded the commission reject ZIP in its current form, study displacement of 1,100+ RSO duplex units, close the R1/R2 fee-out loophole, and prioritize a locally controlled TODAP.
Planning Commission Meeting - Jul 16, 2026 · 17:04 →Urged thoughtful deliberation on density in commercial zones, limits on residential-zone impacts, and infrastructure concerns; was redirected to speak under item 12.A.
Planning Commission Meeting - Jul 16, 2026 · 26:46 →A nearly 30-year resident who recommended a TODAP overlay to preserve local planning input, urged scrutiny of 'feasibility' claims, and asked for clear, timely public communication.
Planning Commission Meeting - Jul 16, 2026 · 1:15:08 →Urged rejection of ZIP as drafted, a duplex displacement analysis, elimination of the R1/R2 fee-out loophole requiring on-site affordable housing, and a strong locally controlled TODAP.
Planning Commission Meeting - Jul 16, 2026 · 17:04 →Supported the city's housing goals but asked the commission to keep growth on commercial corridors, pursue a TODAP now that SB 79 is in effect, and integrate ZIP, TODAP, infrastructure, and environmental review as one effort.
Planning Commission Meeting - Jul 16, 2026 · 1:25:48 →