SB 79 / TODAP
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 29, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Cited Minneapolis experience to argue SB 79-style density reduces affordability; urged a TODAP now and Byers's recusal.
Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting - Jun 29, 2026 · 2:31:58 →Urged the city to begin developing a TOD Alternative Plan now, saying early planning preserves flexibility and community input.
Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 29:04 →Called for intentional, locally guided housing growth through a TODAP rather than relying on state-directed policy.
Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:26:49 →Supported SB 79's TODAP framework, saying it protects rent-stabilized housing and gives the city local control over land use.
Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 32:02 →Supported SCAG's environmental-review-first approach, citing the city's high water table, and urged a TODAP to protect rent-stabilized units.
Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 41:36 →Criticized the council's leadership on SB 79, saying 'your hands are not tied, your hands are folded,' and urged a genuine TODAP discussion.
City Council (Regular) - May 18, 2026 · 45:12 →Raised concerns about declining surpluses, unfunded pension liabilities, and rising staffing; later urged a 5-0 vote to immediately initiate a TODAP.
City Council (Regular) - May 18, 2026 · 3:08:04 →