Zoning

SB 79 / TODAP

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Opposed (2)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 29, 2026.

Public comments (7)

OpposedIgnacio DarnaudeJun 29, 2026

Cited Minneapolis experience to argue SB 79-style density reduces affordability; urged a TODAP now and Byers's recusal.

Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting - Jun 29, 2026 · 2:31:58 →
SupportiveMike HoltzmanJun 15, 2026

Urged the city to begin developing a TOD Alternative Plan now, saying early planning preserves flexibility and community input.

Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 29:04 →
SupportiveJonathan WilsonJun 15, 2026

Called for intentional, locally guided housing growth through a TODAP rather than relying on state-directed policy.

Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:26:49 →
SupportiveCathy WaldmanJun 15, 2026

Supported SB 79's TODAP framework, saying it protects rent-stabilized housing and gives the city local control over land use.

Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 32:02 →
SupportiveIgnacio DarnaudéJun 15, 2026

Supported SCAG's environmental-review-first approach, citing the city's high water table, and urged a TODAP to protect rent-stabilized units.

Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting - Jun 15, 2026 · 41:36 →
OpposedAli ShahidiMay 18, 2026

Criticized the council's leadership on SB 79, saying 'your hands are not tied, your hands are folded,' and urged a genuine TODAP discussion.

City Council (Regular) - May 18, 2026 · 45:12 →
ConcernedVictor OmelczenkoMay 18, 2026

Raised concerns about declining surpluses, unfunded pension liabilities, and rising staffing; later urged a 5-0 vote to immediately initiate a TODAP.

City Council (Regular) - May 18, 2026 · 3:08:04 →