Zoning
SB 79 impacts
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Opposed (2)Concerned (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Apr 20, 2026.
Public comments (3)
OpposedAnita GoswamiApr 20, 2026
Criticized the Council for not studying SB 79 impacts and urged preparation of a transit-oriented development alternative plan (TODAP) to protect residents and businesses.
Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting - Apr 20, 2026 · 36:02 →OpposedKevin GearyApr 20, 2026
Criticized the City for not informing residents about SB 79 redevelopment zones, warning that Boys Town and the Rainbow District could be destroyed, and urged reconsidering the transit alignment tax district.
Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting - Apr 20, 2026 · 38:29 →ConcernedBrad KeistlerApr 20, 2026
Said SB 79 is moving too fast, urged development on main corridors rather than interior neighborhoods, and said the community was not properly informed.
Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting - Apr 20, 2026 · 52:02 →