7811 Santa Monica Blvd project
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Bond Hotel and Residences at 7811 Santa Monica Blvd→At a glance
- Public comments
- 13
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Feb 5, 2026.
Public comments (28)
Ogden Drive resident three buildings away; said the project is too massive for the site and asked the commission to reconsider.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:07:11 →Said his 1119 N. Ogden house appears incorrectly included in the project footprint, and called the design out of step with the neighborhood; asked for redesign, proper lot size and a new EIR.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:08:57 →BRIC member and Laurel resident; warned the project will never be completed and will become another fenced dirt field, citing today's NYT housing study.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:10:50 →Ogden Drive resident and BRIC member; described BRIC as a queer community sanctuary and urged the city to protect such small businesses.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:13:10 →17-year Ogden resident; described years of enduring unfinished construction next door and five stalled sites on his block; urged rebuilding a gym in the project if BRIC is demolished.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:15:26 →Chamber of Commerce president/CEO urged approval, citing the housing crisis, the coming Metro station, affordable units, jobs and the developer's voluntary scale-down.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:18:02 →Owls Neighborhood Watch captain laid out four opposition arguments: the 50,000 sq ft eligibility failure, AB 130's hotel exclusion, toxic site legacy near a daycare, and traffic funneling onto Orange Grove.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:20:06 →Echoed Carter; called the project an objective-standard failure and asked for an updated EIR and design review.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:22:42 →35-year Ogden Drive resident said she never received project notice; urged denial, removal of the hotel use, reduced height, and a new neighborhood meeting.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:24:03 →Argued the lot tie is being used to circumvent minimum site-area requirements, effectively rezoning Ogden Drive to CC2 without a general plan amendment.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:25:54 →19-year Orange Grove resident said the project is tone-deaf and disconnected from the local community.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:28:06 →23-year Ogden resident cited the roughly 4.43-to-1 FAR as staggering and said the design erases neighborhood scale; asked for the required parcel size.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:28:38 →24-year Ogden resident in the 500-foot zone agreed with Carter, said the project fails the 50,000 sq ft standard, and also reported receiving no notice.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:30:22 →Owner of 1121 N. Ogden raised fire danger from overhead power lines over her bungalows and threatened possible legal action if a demolition permit is issued without addressing safety.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:32:37 →Koreatown public servant and BRIC member described the gym as therapy and chosen family, urging it not disappear.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:34:12 →Ogden resident urged denial, arguing a project failing minimum site-area requirements cannot be granted bonuses.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:36:22 →Ogden resident opposed on parking: 126 units but only 107 spaces, no permits for residents, restaurant demand, and the streetscape project eliminating 210 spaces.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:37:55 →Quoted former councilmember John Duran calling Faring untrustworthy, cited 700+ vacant units and 71% hotel occupancy, and criticized the applicants' demeanor toward BRIC speakers.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:40:05 →Opposed staff's recommendation primarily over site toxicity, urging remediation before construction rather than by certificate of occupancy, and questioned the applicant's claimed community support.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:42:34 →Said the project is too massive and cited Faring's blight legacy at French Market and Robertson Lane; asked for an EIR and more reasonable scale.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:44:31 →Called the 2011-12 toxic report totally inadequate — visual-only — and said excavated soil must be tested before landfill disposal regardless of what Sacramento requires.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:46:34 →Property owner and former resident warned the site could become another 'construction graveyard' and criticized the applicant's presentation errors.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:48:36 →Disabled and autistic BRIC member from Los Angeles described the gym's accessibility and specialized support, asking that community loss be weighed.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:49:32 →Family has run Fountain Day School 70 years; raised loss of the adjacent drop-off parking lot, construction protections, and access to environmental studies for parents.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:51:34 →13-year resident (11 on Ogden) echoed opposition, noting the 10,000 sq ft shortfall and urging denial to preserve the city's character.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:53:18 →Argued the resolution cannot be legally supported: the hotel disqualifies AB 130 exemption, the 2019 deemed-complete date can't justify the lot-size relief, and a new EIR is required for the toxic site.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 14:34 →Carpenters union member speaking by Zoom in support, citing local hire, apprenticeships and second-chance career opportunities.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:57:44 →Zoom caller hoping to live near the future Metro station; urged a yes vote to prove West Hollywood is pro-housing.
Planning Commission Meeting - Feb 5, 2026 · 2:58:51 →