Unhoused Services and Strategy
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Feb 10, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Expressed concern regarding city transparency, historical omissions in unhoused data, and the need for comprehensive, community-informed solutions.
City Council - Feb 10, 2026 · 22:26 →Clarified the role and outreach commitments of the Solano Integrated Outreach Team (SIOT) during the encampment pause.
City Council - Feb 10, 2026 · 1:17:50 →Supported compensating lived experience but emphasized the need for structured governance, clear selection criteria, and measurable outcomes.
City Council - Feb 10, 2026 · 1:22:03 →Requested broader inclusion of housed residents' perspectives, expanded transitional housing options with privacy, and faster action on White Slough.
City Council - Feb 10, 2026 · 1:25:00 →Criticized city staff's characterization of barriers to safe camping and questioned abatement plans on private property without housing alternatives.
City Council - Feb 10, 2026 · 1:28:01 →Shared perspective from the Solano County Lived Experience Committee, emphasizing privacy concerns and the need for systemic solutions.
City Council - Feb 10, 2026 · 1:30:59 →