Flock Safety Technology Contract Rescission
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 17, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Stated that facial recognition and automated surveillance technologies carry high false-positive rates, threaten civil liberties, and erode public trust.
Surveillance Advisory Board - Sep 17, 2026 · 51:43 →Urged the board to cancel the Flock contract, emphasizing that everyday movements should not be tracked and citing data misread rates.
Surveillance Advisory Board - Sep 17, 2026 · 1:02:18 →Expressed concern over cameras pointing at private homes and urged funding schools instead of surveillance.
Surveillance Advisory Board - Sep 17, 2026 · 1:06:02 →Noted that numerous cities nationwide have canceled Flock contracts due to compromised public trust and privacy violations.
Surveillance Advisory Board - Sep 17, 2026 · 1:08:43 →Speaking on behalf of ACLU NorCal, called for the cancellation of Vallejo's Flock contract due to misuse risks by outside and federal agencies.
Surveillance Advisory Board - Sep 17, 2026 · 1:10:34 →Objected to tax dollars funding surveillance systems that invade privacy and urged spending money on housing and healthcare instead.
Surveillance Advisory Board - Sep 17, 2026 · 1:13:07 →