California Record
Vallejo
Public Safety

Flock ALPR and Gunshot Detection Oversight

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (4)Concerned (4)

At a glance

Public comments
8
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 18, 2026.

Public comments (8)

ConcernedEric McGovernJun 18, 2026

Questioned the security and auditability of Flock cameras and raised concerns about mass surveillance and lack of public debate on digital tracking.

Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 10:17 →
ConcernedMike LacaveJun 18, 2026

Noted the high volume of camera alerts and asked how police prioritize responses, misreads, and redactions.

Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 18:41 →
OpposedJose CarrizalesJun 18, 2026

Urged the board to drop Flock contracts due to reliability issues and budget constraints.

Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 36:29 →
ConcernedLiat MeitzenheimerJun 18, 2026

Asked for robust tracking mechanisms for data shared with outside agencies to prevent unauthorized access by immigration or federal authorities.

Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 39:32 →
OpposedShea GraveJun 18, 2026

Raised concerns about system hacks and urged the board to recognize fundamental flaws in automated surveillance.

Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 43:13 →
OpposedThe PeopleJun 18, 2026

Stated that the board's job is to scrutinize systems rather than make them palatable, and urged canceling the Flock contract.

Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 59:34 →
ConcernedRJJun 18, 2026

Pointed out that Vallejo's transparency page shows data sharing with agencies facing lawsuits over state law violations.

Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 47:18 →
OpposedGraceJun 18, 2026

Expressed that automated surveillance feels like profiling and violates Fourth Amendment privacy rights.

Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 48:18 →