Flock ALPR and Gunshot Detection Oversight
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 18, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Questioned the security and auditability of Flock cameras and raised concerns about mass surveillance and lack of public debate on digital tracking.
Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 10:17 →Noted the high volume of camera alerts and asked how police prioritize responses, misreads, and redactions.
Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 18:41 →Urged the board to drop Flock contracts due to reliability issues and budget constraints.
Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 36:29 →Asked for robust tracking mechanisms for data shared with outside agencies to prevent unauthorized access by immigration or federal authorities.
Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 39:32 →Raised concerns about system hacks and urged the board to recognize fundamental flaws in automated surveillance.
Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 43:13 →Stated that the board's job is to scrutinize systems rather than make them palatable, and urged canceling the Flock contract.
Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 59:34 →Pointed out that Vallejo's transparency page shows data sharing with agencies facing lawsuits over state law violations.
Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 47:18 →Expressed that automated surveillance feels like profiling and violates Fourth Amendment privacy rights.
Surveillance Advisory Board - Jun 18, 2026 · 48:18 →