California Record
Tustin
Roads

Design Review (DR) 2026-0001

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (2)Concerned (4)

At a glance

Public comments
8
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jul 29, 2026.

Public comments (8)

ConcernedJeff KindigJul 29, 2026

Raised concerns about construction noise, truck traffic routing on Vandenberg Lane, maintaining neighborhood access, and preserving the traffic-calming bulb-out.

Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:31:19 →
ConcernedBill HammerlyJul 29, 2026

Questioned whether Tustin is saturated with car washes, asked for clarification on drive-thru concepts, and requested an aggressive construction schedule.

Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:34:30 →
OpposedLiz AllenJul 29, 2026

Opposed the vacation of Enderle Center Drive, arguing it will worsen traffic alongside incoming residential units.

Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:37:11 →
SupportiveArmin KarmardianJul 29, 2026

Spoke strongly in support of the Enderle Center project on behalf of Zov's, praising Burnham Ward's vision and community town green.

Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:40:00 →
ConcernedKaren RobbJul 29, 2026

Expressed sadness over the displacement of Chemers Gallery after 47 years in business and the difficulty of finding a relocation site in Tustin.

Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:43:58 →
ConcernedMelissa SeeleyJul 29, 2026

Questioned the traffic study conclusions and asked about resident-only parking permits to protect surrounding neighborhoods.

Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:47:38 →
OpposedPatty MoultonJul 29, 2026

Expressed opposition to the street vacation, drive-thrus, and car wash due to increased traffic concerns on Vandenberg Lane.

Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:49:03 →
MixedPete BeattyJul 29, 2026

Commended the developer for a wonderful project while noting ongoing concerns regarding parking availability.

Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:50:50 →