Design Review (DR) 2026-0001
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 29, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Raised concerns about construction noise, truck traffic routing on Vandenberg Lane, maintaining neighborhood access, and preserving the traffic-calming bulb-out.
Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:31:19 →Questioned whether Tustin is saturated with car washes, asked for clarification on drive-thru concepts, and requested an aggressive construction schedule.
Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:34:30 →Opposed the vacation of Enderle Center Drive, arguing it will worsen traffic alongside incoming residential units.
Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:37:11 →Spoke strongly in support of the Enderle Center project on behalf of Zov's, praising Burnham Ward's vision and community town green.
Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:40:00 →Expressed sadness over the displacement of Chemers Gallery after 47 years in business and the difficulty of finding a relocation site in Tustin.
Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:43:58 →Questioned the traffic study conclusions and asked about resident-only parking permits to protect surrounding neighborhoods.
Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:47:38 →Expressed opposition to the street vacation, drive-thrus, and car wash due to increased traffic concerns on Vandenberg Lane.
Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:49:03 →Commended the developer for a wonderful project while noting ongoing concerns regarding parking availability.
Planning Commission - Jul 29, 2026 · 1:50:50 →