Fire administrative services agreement
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Modesto fire services agreement under fire→At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 24, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Local 2434 president urged letting the Modesto contract expire, citing four deputy chiefs in three-and-a-half years, a vacant fire marshal post, lost identity, and threats to withdraw automatic aid.
City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 1:27:25 →Said the presentation was unbalanced, the public can't tell Modesto's voice from Turlock's, and called it 'consistency of instability.'
City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 58:49 →Urged the council not to make a rushed 3-2 decision and to hold community meetings, saying firefighters' concerns aren't being heard.
City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 2:05:41 →Recapped the contract's history, said Turlock has had its own chiefs since 1957, and urged letting the agreement expire and restoring a Turlock fire chief.
City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 2:07:02 →Said firefighters deserve independence if that's what they want, warning that overriding their wishes would crush morale.
City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 2:16:35 →Said four chiefs in five years is a red flag, the savings are trivial, and suggested a public survey — and possibly waiting until after the November election.
City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 2:14:52 →A 32-year retired Turlock firefighter described declining local decision-making, station coverage gaps, and retention losses to Modesto.
City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 2:18:07 →A planning commissioner who has met with firefighters said local control can rebuild the department the way Chief Hedden rebuilt police.
City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 2:12:38 →