High PriorityTaxes Budgetopen

Civil Grand Jury responses

Summary

Former 2025-26 grand jurors told the Board its September 1 responses to their reports were aggressive and dismissive, citing 24 deficiencies including missed legal requirements under Penal Code 933.05. Supervisor Brandon pushed back, saying the reports omitted facts he had provided.

At a glance

Total mentions
12
Last 30 days
0

Rising — discussed at 3 meetings since Sep 15, 2026, up from 1 in the two months before.

Impact analysis

💰Financial impact

County Counsel recused from advising the next grand jury, potentially shifting advisory costs to the DA or state, which he said should be minimal.

✅Who benefits

Residents who want transparent, accountable county government.

⚠️Who could be affected

Board members named in the reports face continued public criticism and questions about impartiality.

Mentions & discussions (4)

We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.

The weekly brief for Tuolumne County

What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.

Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.