Zoning

Data center moratorium

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (6)Opposed (1)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
8
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Sep 1, 2026.

Public comments (8)

SupportiveUnidentified ResidentSep 1, 2026

Self-described huge AI proponent said 45 days feels too short and urged a longer pause, noting most data center jobs are remote.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 6:07:03 →
SupportiveMyrna DoringSep 1, 2026

Jamestown resident said 45 days would be reasonable to set guidelines before any proposal arrives.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 6:08:59 →
OpposedMike SmithwickSep 1, 2026

Urged rejection of the moratorium, saying no emergency exists and existing CEQA and CDD processes suffice.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 6:10:09 →
SupportiveUnidentified ResidentSep 1, 2026

Supported the 45-day planning pause, noting the county is a steward of water for the rest of Northern California.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 6:12:32 →
SupportiveUnidentified ResidentSep 1, 2026

Supported a moratorium so the county can get ahead of proposals like the Dollar General situation.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 6:15:07 →
ConcernedMarianne SchmidtSep 1, 2026

Asked the board to consider whether a massive data center fits a rural county, listing questions on power, water, noise, generators, and permanent jobs.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 2:51:51 →
SupportiveEmily PardeeSep 1, 2026

Supported public hearings, citing environmental concerns, water, and recent power outages; said 45 days to think is reasonable.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 7:18 →
SupportiveEllen BeckSep 1, 2026

Encouraged the moratorium as a pause to gather information, not a ban.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 6:05:35 →