Data center moratorium
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Sep 1, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Self-described huge AI proponent said 45 days feels too short and urged a longer pause, noting most data center jobs are remote.
Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 6:07:03 →Jamestown resident said 45 days would be reasonable to set guidelines before any proposal arrives.
Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 6:08:59 →Urged rejection of the moratorium, saying no emergency exists and existing CEQA and CDD processes suffice.
Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 6:10:09 →Supported the 45-day planning pause, noting the county is a steward of water for the rest of Northern California.
Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 6:12:32 →Supported a moratorium so the county can get ahead of proposals like the Dollar General situation.
Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 6:15:07 →Asked the board to consider whether a massive data center fits a rural county, listing questions on power, water, noise, generators, and permanent jobs.
Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 2:51:51 →Supported public hearings, citing environmental concerns, water, and recent power outages; said 45 days to think is reasonable.
Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 7:18 →Encouraged the moratorium as a pause to gather information, not a ban.
Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 6:05:35 →