California Record
Tulare County
Development

Zone Variance PZV 25029 / Parcel Map PPM 25019

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (2)

At a glance

Public comments
3
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Aug 12, 2026.

Public comments (3)

OpposedJudy Boydston ElbrockAug 12, 2026

The adjacent owner said her security cameras have filmed foxes for over a year and insists they are kit foxes, not gray foxes, and raised concerns about narrow one-lane roads and a flooding corner at Avenue 320. She opposed the split outright.

Planning Commission - Aug 12, 2026 · 23:26 →
OpposedJames NelsonAug 12, 2026

A 34-year resident south of the project said one of the new houses would look directly into his living room, questioned bridge and driveway plans along his property line, and accused the applicant of destroying the area's character for financial gain.

Planning Commission - Aug 12, 2026 · 28:51 →
SupportiveNate StrableAug 12, 2026

The applicant rebutted accusations, saying he tried to buy un-subdividable land to expand farming, will keep farming the grapefruit operation, and delayed the final map intentionally — he is not building a subdivision anytime soon.

Planning Commission - Aug 12, 2026 · 33:30 →