California Record
Tracy
Zoning

Districting Maps

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Concerned (3)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jan 13, 2026.

Public comments (7)

ConcernedPat HowellJan 13, 2026

Expressed concern about splitting Area 3 in the Tangerine plan and favored keeping neighborhoods together like in the Lime or Green plans.

Special Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 59:02 →
SupportiveTonya VaughnJan 13, 2026

Praised the city's outreach efforts and emphasized the importance of fair districting free from gerrymandering.

Special Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:00:12 →
SupportiveChuck DubyJan 13, 2026

Supported the Green plan for keeping neighborhood ages together and suggested minor adjustments in the southern blocks.

Special Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:02:50 →
ConcernedMelissa BarrettJan 13, 2026

Emphasized that districting is a civil rights issue and urged continued transparency and equity for minority communities.

Special Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:06:19 →
NeutralNancy YoungJan 13, 2026

Discussed rapid population growth in Section 4 and suggested adjusting boundaries to account for uncounted residents.

Special Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:09:34 →
ConcernedMs. EnglishJan 13, 2026

Highlighted rapid growth in Tracy Hills and argued that official census data undercounts the area's population.

Special Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:15:17 →
SupportiveLiz BakerJan 13, 2026

Expressed support for the districting process and noted that alternative data sources are available beyond the 2020 census.

Special Meeting - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:15:35 →