Simpson Road Bridge
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Simpson Road Bridge erosion emergency→At a glance
- Public comments
- 4
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 29, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Wanted to comment on the Simpson Road Bridge agreement but was asked to wait until the item came up on the agenda.
Board of Supervisors — September 29, 2026 · 17:40 →A caller described how vital the bridge is to their family — eight trips a day to school and work — and calculated $100/week in extra fuel costs if it closed.
Board of Supervisors — September 29, 2026 · 1:08:00 →A neighboring farmer who's watched the bridge erode for six years called it 'code red' — an emergency — and urged riprap and channel clearing before winter.
Board of Supervisors — September 29, 2026 · 1:12:02 →A civil engineer argued gravel removal is not a proper emergency fix without hydraulic studies and warned it could cause more scour or bank damage on the other side.
Board of Supervisors — September 29, 2026 · 1:15:24 →A Simpson Road resident objected to the scale of extraction — up to 220,000 cubic yards — estimating 25,000-30,000 truck trips would damage roads and create safety hazards.
Board of Supervisors — September 29, 2026 · 1:23:10 →Asked whether diverting the creek to the south side would jeopardize the other bank, and suggested a one-year trial rather than a five-year deal.
Board of Supervisors — September 29, 2026 · 1:29:32 →A caller said the gravel removal would cost at least $2 million and called it 'a blank check and no plan.'
Board of Supervisors — September 29, 2026 · 1:29:00 →