California Record
Sutter County
Zoning

Smith event venue (Item 17)

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (5)Opposed (4)

At a glance

Public comments
9
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 26, 2026.

Public comments (9)

OpposedElizabeth RomnessMay 26, 2026

Lifelong Buttes resident said roads are dangerous, noise from similar venues is already unbearable, and 850 people in a fragile ecosystem contradicts decades of protecting the Buttes.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Session — May 26, 2026 · 1:05:17 →
OpposedMargaret ScilesMay 26, 2026

Lives directly opposite the site; raised noise, traffic, trash, parking with one way in and out, and drinking-and-fire danger concerns for up to 850 guests.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Session — May 26, 2026 · 1:08:17 →
OpposedDonise DavisonMay 26, 2026

Smith's neighbor on Pass Road; worried about traffic control, trash, litter in her driveway, trespassers, rattlesnakes, property values, and slow emergency response.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Session — May 26, 2026 · 1:12:22 →
OpposedArlan SmithMay 26, 2026

Argued the venue is a commercial business that doesn't fit ag zoning, will set a precedent for copycat venues, and that the Planning Commission got it right.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Session — May 26, 2026 · 1:16:05 →
SupportiveBrian DavisMay 26, 2026

With nonprofit Be Extra; said not every event will hit 850 people, events would typically be alcohol-free, and the venue keeps nonprofit fundraisers in Sutter County.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Session — May 26, 2026 · 1:20:33 →
SupportiveLiz GatesMay 26, 2026

Wedding photographer for years; said upscale events are controlled with licensed alcohol service, security, and luxury facilities, and keep wedding dollars local.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Session — May 26, 2026 · 1:21:59 →
SupportiveAmran BathMay 26, 2026

Said a nationally recognized mountain range in the county's backyard is an opportunity that could bring conservation events and benefit everyone if done together.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Session — May 26, 2026 · 1:24:25 →
SupportiveJim WhiteakerMay 26, 2026

The applicant's consultant argued the project meets every county policy, the applicant is a good walnut farmer and community steward, and the venue could bring about $1 million to local businesses.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Session — May 26, 2026 · 1:25:48 →
SupportiveMike Smith Jr.May 26, 2026

The applicant said he cares deeply about the Buttes, lives there, and insisted noise (65 dB cap), traffic, trash, and fire concerns have all been addressed with county staff.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Session — May 26, 2026 · 1:30:00 →