State election lawsuit against the County
Summary
In closed session the Board voted 4-0 to provide no defense for the County or Registrar of Voters Clint Curtis in the Attorney General's election lawsuit (People v. County of Shasta, now on appeal as C106517).
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 1
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 16, 2026.
Impact analysis
Potential legal exposure for the County and Registrar with no County-funded defense authorized.
Taxpayers potentially saved defense costs if the Board's position prevails.
The Registrar of Voters and the County are left to fend for themselves in the appeal.
Mentions & discussions (2)
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting - Jun 16, 2026
In closed session the Board voted 4-0 to provide no defense for the County or Registrar of Voters Clint Curtis in the Attorney General's election lawsuit (People v. County of Shasta, now on appeal as C106517).
California sues Shasta County — as expected — after voters approve measure to eliminate most mail-in voting
California sues Shasta County — as expected — after voters approve measure to eliminate most mail-in voting Los Angeles Times
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Shasta County
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.