California Record
Shasta County
Development

Mobile home park rent stabilization

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (5)Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
6

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 27, 2026.

Public comments (6)

SupportiveUnidentified Resident (Shasta County Watchdog)Oct 27, 2026

Cited research showing the park-owning corporation faced lawsuits and penalties from multiple district attorneys, and urged the board to cap rents before residents lose their homes.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting - Oct 27, 2026 · 12:00 →
OpposedSualo LondonoOct 27, 2026

Speaking for WMA and park owners, argued Shasta's situation differs from Tehama's, that rent control sends a bad message to housing providers, and urged direct collaboration instead.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting - Oct 27, 2026 · 11:29 →
SupportiveKelly RigeroOct 27, 2026

A Riverland resident asked the board to be proactive and explore an urgency ordinance for interim protection while a permanent rent stabilization policy is developed.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting - Oct 27, 2026 · 15:59 →
SupportiveCrystal BakerOct 27, 2026

An Anderson mobile home owner whose rent jumped from $450 to $645 with $921 scheduled in December, presented a 31-signature petition and directly pressed Supervisor Kelstrom to act.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting - Oct 27, 2026 · 17:55 →
SupportiveTammy JarvisOct 27, 2026

A retired nurse at Cottonwood Ridge asked that rent increases be kept in line with retirees' fixed cost-of-living raises.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting - Oct 27, 2026 · 20:08 →
SupportiveRalph BarclayOct 27, 2026

Urged the board to adopt and enforce rent control, and raised overgrown hazardous property and roadside mowing concerns on Riverland Drive.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting - Oct 27, 2026 · 22:31 →