County Counsel contract
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 5
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 27, 2026.
Public comments (5)
Argued Larmour's contract renewal shouldn't be on the agenda, that the new board should choose its counsel, and questioned Crye's ability to vote given an alleged personal conflict.
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting - Oct 27, 2026 · 4:30:19 →Asked whether the board wants Larmour in charge after what she described as the shredding of 2024 ballots and records.
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting - Oct 27, 2026 · 4:34:09 →Spoke solely to Larmour's performance as a department head — responsive, tireless, money-saving — and urged the board to evaluate him on his work, not the politics.
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting - Oct 27, 2026 · 1:35:49 →Pressed Crye to recuse again, cited destruction of 2024 PRA documents, and urged the board to take back its power.
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting - Oct 27, 2026 · 4:39:06 →Questioned why the contract is being extended early, why Crye can vote after recusing, and cited an admitted Brown Act violation in her own case.
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting - Oct 27, 2026 · 4:41:04 →