Weed Abatement

New owner of 20885 Wardell Drive (item #2) since March 24; said the prior owner and gardener already fixed the issue, has photos, and asked to be removed from the list.

Longtime Old Oak Way resident says she never received the November or December county letters, cleaned her property by February 25, and asked to be removed from the list (item #17).

Delivered a sharp critique: the county inspected out of fire season, gave under ten days to comply, trespassed without a warrant, and rushed the program — he asked for his parcel's removal and reconsideration of the whole program, and noted violations at council members' own homes.

Homeowner on Ashley Way said she never learned what the violation was or the consequences, and asked the council to give people a grace period and clearer notice.

Caring for her seriously ill mother and unable to do yard work herself; never got the letters, sent photos showing compliance, and asked to be removed from the list (item #6).

Hillside resident supporting the program's goal but arguing the 100-foot rule is inadequate on large hillside parcels — dead trees and brush along Pierce Road could block evacuation.

Owner of 12048 Parker Ranch Road said he never received notice letters until Nathan rang his doorbell April 7; his gardeners clear weeds every spring and he promised compliance by April 30.

Speaking for Garrett Farms on Mount Eden Road, cited confusion over property lines and compliance requirements, hundreds of man-hours of cleanup already done, and asked to be taken off the list.

Suggested property owners cleared after a complaint shouldn't pay inspection fees, and travelers should get automatic extensions with proof.