California Record
Santa Clara
Development

Priority setting framework

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Concerned (1)Neutral (2)

At a glance

Public comments
4
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 30, 2026.

Public comments (4)

NeutralWanda BuckMar 30, 2026

Suggested focusing on key issues during priority setting and noted that engagement surveys can take too long to complete.

Governance and Ethics Committee — March 30, 2026 · 1:14:46 →
NeutralDan OndrasekMar 30, 2026

Recommended asking the public what specific city staff projects are most important rather than county-level issues like homelessness and drug abuse.

Governance and Ethics Committee — March 30, 2026 · 1:17:37 →
SupportiveKPTMar 30, 2026

Suggested council members administer district surveys to reach marginalized communities who cannot attend meetings.

Governance and Ethics Committee — March 30, 2026 · 1:19:15 →
ConcernedAdam ThompsonMar 30, 2026

Argued that past priority sessions limited public participation and noted some listed priorities are internal staff goals rather than citywide goals.

Governance and Ethics Committee — March 30, 2026 · 1:22:11 →