El Camino Real Specific Plan
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
El Camino Real Specific Plan→At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 19, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Spoke on behalf of SV@Home in strong support of the El Camino Real Specific Plan, praising its density increases and transit-oriented framework.
City Council and Authorities Concurrent — May 19, 2026 · 6:19:05 →Expressed support on behalf of Santa Clara Community Advocates for the El Camino Real Specific Plan while noting concerns about reduced housing capacity and restrictive shadow planes.
City Council and Authorities Concurrent — May 19, 2026 · 6:23:11 →Thanked staff for years of work on the El Camino Real Specific Plan and recommended minor adjustments to corridor residential density ranges.
City Council and Authorities Concurrent — May 19, 2026 · 6:25:53 →Expressed support for the El Camino Real Specific Plan and highlighted bicycle and pedestrian improvements.
City Council and Authorities Concurrent — May 19, 2026 · 6:27:47 →Spoke in support of the El Camino Real Specific Plan for providing transit-accessible housing with minimal neighborhood impacts.
City Council and Authorities Concurrent — May 19, 2026 · 6:29:01 →Supported the corridor plan's mobility and parking reductions but criticized mandatory architectural massing articulation requirements.
City Council and Authorities Concurrent — May 19, 2026 · 6:31:17 →Expressed concern about not receiving adequate notice for meetings, parking shortages from new housing units, and potential traffic lane reductions.
Planning Commission — April 8, 2026 · 2:53:15 →