Diablo Canyon 2045 Coalition
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Diablo Canyon 2045 Coalition→At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 16, 2026.
Public comments (9)
Read Senator Laird's letter urging the Board to postpone joining the coalition until safety and SB 931 funding questions are resolved.
Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 14:08 →Mothers for Peace speaker asked the Board to pull item 14 and vote no, citing unresolved safety and seismic questions.
Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 22:10 →Urged removal of item 14, noting nuclear waste is not clean energy and a dozen letters opposed the coalition.
Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 25:35 →Nuclear-licensed physicist warned of radioactive waste risks and tourism impacts of a Fukushima-type event.
Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 27:41 →COLAB representative urged a yes vote, calling the plant right for the environment, grid and economy.
Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 30:32 →Pipe trades business manager supported the coalition, citing career pathways at the plant.
Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 34:35 →PG&E senior VP defended the plant's safety record, NRC license extension and grid reliability.
Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 40:40 →Asked the Board to resolve SB 931 mitigation funding shortfalls before supporting extension.
Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 46:06 →Asked the Board, if it joins the coalition, to fight for local school and community funding from the plant's operation.
Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:02:24 →