Environment

Diablo Canyon 2045 Coalition

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (5)

At a glance

Public comments
9
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 16, 2026.

Public comments (9)

OpposedKara WoodruffJun 16, 2026

Read Senator Laird's letter urging the Board to postpone joining the coalition until safety and SB 931 funding questions are resolved.

Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 14:08 →
OpposedZill ZamekJun 16, 2026

Mothers for Peace speaker asked the Board to pull item 14 and vote no, citing unresolved safety and seismic questions.

Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 22:10 →
OpposedJane SwansonJun 16, 2026

Urged removal of item 14, noting nuclear waste is not clean energy and a dozen letters opposed the coalition.

Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 25:35 →
OpposedMargaret FrerkingJun 16, 2026

Nuclear-licensed physicist warned of radioactive waste risks and tourism impacts of a Fukushima-type event.

Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 27:41 →
SupportiveGreg HaskinJun 16, 2026

COLAB representative urged a yes vote, calling the plant right for the environment, grid and economy.

Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 30:32 →
SupportiveDavid BaldwinJun 16, 2026

Pipe trades business manager supported the coalition, citing career pathways at the plant.

Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 34:35 →
SupportiveMaureen ZawalickJun 16, 2026

PG&E senior VP defended the plant's safety record, NRC license extension and grid reliability.

Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 40:40 →
OpposedAnnie FrewJun 16, 2026

Asked the Board to resolve SB 931 mitigation funding shortfalls before supporting extension.

Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 46:06 →
MixedBen LippertJun 16, 2026

Asked the Board, if it joins the coalition, to fight for local school and community funding from the plant's operation.

Board of Supervisors - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:02:24 →