Water Utilities

CSA 10A water rate increase

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (4)

At a glance

Public comments
4
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jul 7, 2026.

Public comments (4)

OpposedSusan DunnJul 7, 2026

Opposed the Cayucos water rate increase, arguing the county is stacking the Prop 218 vote with vacant-lot owners, charging 155% overhead on a pipeline project, and offering no plan to cut costs or debt.

Board of Supervisors - Jul 7, 2026 · 10:05 →
OpposedCharles BergsonJul 7, 2026

Said residents have asked for the rate study since January without receiving it, and claimed ratepayers were never properly noticed.

Board of Supervisors - Jul 7, 2026 · 13:24 →
OpposedRachele WilsonJul 7, 2026

Detailed rate comparisons: CSA 10A is $5 million in debt versus zero for the other two Cayucos districts, and her bill would rise to 134% more than neighbors within five years; asked for a town hall and a ratepayer-only Prop 218 vote.

Board of Supervisors - Jul 7, 2026 · 18:33 →
OpposedRuss TaylorJul 7, 2026

Retired engineer recalled being promised full replacement of asbestos-cement pipe in the 2018 rate increase but says only about 1,000 feet was replaced; 'we were snookered.'

Board of Supervisors - Jul 7, 2026 · 21:55 →