Water Utilities

CSA 10A rate protest

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (7)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Sep 1, 2026.

Public comments (7)

OpposedRachel WilsonSep 1, 2026

Argued the protest count improperly included 98 unbuilt parcels, including a creek bed, violating Prop 218 rules against charging for future use.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 3:03:49 →
OpposedSusan DunnSep 1, 2026

Cited 170% overhead on the Cheney pipeline project and questioned staffing costs and an unlogged F-450 truck; said 98% of neighbors she canvassed oppose the increase.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 3:07:35 →
OpposedSusie AndersonSep 1, 2026

Called this the second 35%-scale hike in a decade and demanded an independent forensic audit.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 3:10:58 →
OpposedMary Ann CarnegieSep 1, 2026

Noted 68% of full-time residents protested and suggested privatization or cost-cutting, since two private water companies deliver the same water far cheaper.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 3:15:00 →
OpposedJohn CarselSep 1, 2026

Said the district is $5 million in debt with unclear accounting, citing rented vs. purchased equipment and unexplained borrowing.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 3:17:32 →
OpposedRuss TaylorSep 1, 2026

Noted fire flow is still at severity level three despite the 2018 rate increase that promised infrastructure improvements.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 3:21:01 →
OpposedTom SteadSep 1, 2026

Compared his tiny Cayucos bill to a $42 bill in Templeton for a much larger property, asking why costs differ so much.

Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 3:22:54 →