CSA 10A rate protest
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Sep 1, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Argued the protest count improperly included 98 unbuilt parcels, including a creek bed, violating Prop 218 rules against charging for future use.
Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 3:03:49 →Cited 170% overhead on the Cheney pipeline project and questioned staffing costs and an unlogged F-450 truck; said 98% of neighbors she canvassed oppose the increase.
Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 3:07:35 →Called this the second 35%-scale hike in a decade and demanded an independent forensic audit.
Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 3:10:58 →Noted 68% of full-time residents protested and suggested privatization or cost-cutting, since two private water companies deliver the same water far cheaper.
Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 3:15:00 →Said the district is $5 million in debt with unclear accounting, citing rented vs. purchased equipment and unexplained borrowing.
Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 3:17:32 →Noted fire flow is still at severity level three despite the 2018 rate increase that promised infrastructure improvements.
Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 3:21:01 →Compared his tiny Cayucos bill to a $42 bill in Templeton for a much larger property, asking why costs differ so much.
Board of Supervisors - Sep 1, 2026 · 3:22:54 →