Development

Cayucos annexation tax exchange

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (2)

At a glance

Public comments
3
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jul 28, 2026.

Public comments (3)

OpposedDavid AtheyJul 28, 2026

The sanitary district manager asked the item be pulled, said no fiscal analysis justified the 0% tax share, and warned the precedent affects all special districts.

Board of Supervisors - Jul 28, 2026 · 21:04 →
OpposedIan McCarvilleJul 28, 2026

Speaking for applicant Steinmann, said the project followed every approval in good faith and asked the board to direct staff toward an equitable tax agreement.

Board of Supervisors - Jul 28, 2026 · 28:32 →
SupportiveTess StapletonJul 28, 2026

The applicant's cousin and co-investor described five years of work and asked the board to let the project move forward while agencies negotiate.

Board of Supervisors - Jul 28, 2026 · 31:32 →