Development

Rachel Court development appeal

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (4)

At a glance

Public comments
4
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 11, 2026.

Public comments (4)

OpposedCheryl LitsterMar 11, 2026

Alleged the 2023 lot subdivision misreported existing houses, criticized the five-foot wall 12 inches from a neighboring home, cited the fire marshal on setbacks, and raised garbage-bin and parking concerns.

Planning Commission · 52:29 →
OpposedLiza PucciniMar 11, 2026

Owner of 2080 and 2098 Rachel Street; said she never got a survey map when buying, worries the wall will block light and make the house impossible to paint or maintain, and hopes the wall can be removed.

Planning Commission · 56:02 →
OpposedKelly McCormickMar 11, 2026

Lives next door; said communication has been poor, questioned the developer's profit and treatment of the neighbor, and cited loss of a large tree and parking shortages.

Planning Commission · 59:10 →
OpposedAmy BertorelliMar 11, 2026

HOA vice president for 19 homes; framed the issue as the purpose of zoning — neighborhood character, property values, safety, and parking for potentially 14 additional cars.

Planning Commission · 1:02:01 →