California Record
San Joaquin County
Zoning

Artificial Intelligence Data Center Regulations and Moratorium

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Concerned (3)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 1, 2026.

Public comments (5)

ConcernedDenise Aguilar-MendezSep 1, 2026

Questioned the rapid push for AI data centers, warning about severe strains on local groundwater, electricity rates, and agricultural land, and asking for community town halls.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Meeting — September 1, 2026 · 1:50:46 →
SupportiveMatthew AmenSep 1, 2026

A local AI startup founder praised the board for getting ahead of data center issues, highlighting that local tech solutions can support AI without draining water and energy.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Meeting — September 1, 2026 · 2:46:52 →
ConcernedMary ElizabethSep 1, 2026

Suggested that the board carefully define data centers and advanced manufacturing, ensure advisory committees are open to the public, and prioritize renewable or clean energy sources.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Meeting — September 1, 2026 · 2:50:02 →
SupportiveMargo ProuseSep 1, 2026

Supported a moratorium on data centers, warning about their 24/7 power and water demands, deteriorating air quality from warehouses, and the need to protect resident quality of life.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Meeting — September 1, 2026 · 2:53:05 →
ConcernedCarla HoneySep 1, 2026

Called via phone to support thoughtful planning around data centers, noting the vast number already operating overseas and questioning how city-approved projects might affect unincorporated areas.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Meeting — September 1, 2026 · 2:59:25 →