taxes-budget
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 11
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 24, 2026.
Public comments (11)
Called for postponing the PRD 13A tax vote until historical underfunding and transparency issues are resolved.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - LAND USE — June 24, 2026 · 1:57:36 →Legal counsel argued that PRD special tax measures face constitutional hurdles and mismanagement issues.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - LAND USE — June 24, 2026 · 2:00:00 →Highlighted mapping errors, parcel allocation flaws, and voting irregularities in PRD 13A.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - LAND USE — June 24, 2026 · 1:57:21 →Stated that residents should not bear the financial burden of decades of county underfunding in PRD 13A.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - LAND USE — June 24, 2026 · 2:08:42 →Requested a delayed vote and lower tax increase for PRD road repairs.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - LAND USE — June 24, 2026 · 2:09:53 →Asked to delay the tax vote and ensure utility companies pay for aqueduct-related road damage.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - LAND USE — June 24, 2026 · 2:11:00 →Criticized the ultimatum between a massive tax increase and PRD dissolution.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - LAND USE — June 24, 2026 · 2:12:28 →Noted a lack of property disclosures regarding PRD obligations during real estate transactions.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - LAND USE — June 24, 2026 · 2:13:45 →Argued that utility heavy equipment contributed to road wear and requested shared financial responsibility.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - LAND USE — June 24, 2026 · 2:14:50 →Raised concerns regarding parcel exemption discrepancies and road maintenance history in Mesa Grove.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - LAND USE — June 24, 2026 · 2:17:30 →Requested exclusion from the PRD 13A assessment district based on prior county assurances.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - LAND USE — June 24, 2026 · 2:26:01 →