101 Ash Street lease amendment
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 15, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Longtime follower of the Ash Street saga urging the project move forward ASAP for affordable housing.
2pm City Council Meeting - Sep 15, 2026 · 1:59:03 →Warned that the developer entities are shell companies with no assets, questioned conflicts of interest, and asked for a building condition report.
2pm City Council Meeting - Sep 15, 2026 · 2:00:34 →Questioned how the building will last until 2091 without a condition report and asked about developer profits and alleged conflicts.
2pm City Council Meeting - Sep 15, 2026 · 2:02:01 →Echoed concerns about an alleged conflict of interest, developer profits, and the lack of a building condition report.
2pm City Council Meeting - Sep 15, 2026 · 2:02:26 →Asked how asbestos issues are being addressed and mitigated in the project.
2pm City Council Meeting - Sep 15, 2026 · 2:03:34 →Endorsed warnings from other speakers and expressed distrust of the city's real estate assets department.
2pm City Council Meeting - Sep 15, 2026 · 2:04:37 →