California Record
San Clemente
Development

Hanson Hotel Appeal

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (7)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 19, 2026.

Public comments (7)

OpposedJamie HallMay 19, 2026

Argued on behalf of UNITE HERE Local 11 that the hotel project requires a full EIR and violates coastal protection and CEQA laws.

City Council - May 19, 2026 · 2:14:36 →
OpposedFrancis EnglerMay 19, 2026

Urged the council to grant the appeal and conduct an EIR, noting plant species and habitat on the project site.

City Council - May 19, 2026 · 3:16:42 →
OpposedGuadalupe OrtizMay 19, 2026

Spoke through an interpreter in support of the appeal, citing unstudied traffic impacts.

City Council - May 19, 2026 · 2:33:50 →
OpposedAndrea BarreraMay 19, 2026

Requested affordable accommodations and a full EIR for the hotel project.

City Council - May 19, 2026 · 2:35:52 →
OpposedHerminda GilMay 19, 2026

Argued that vegetation removal invalidated environmental reviews and urged upholding the appeal.

City Council - May 19, 2026 · 2:38:06 →
OpposedRon VanderhoffMay 19, 2026

Described native coastal sage scrub vegetation on the site and disputed claims that it was merely weed-covered land.

City Council - May 19, 2026 · 2:38:56 →
OpposedJuan MunozMay 19, 2026

Argued that visitor-serving hotel traffic and amenities warrant a full environmental impact report.

City Council - May 19, 2026 · 4:32:00 →