Customs and Border Protection Surveillance Lease
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jan 20, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Requested that agenda item 11M regarding the CBP camera lease be moved earlier in the meeting for public convenience.
City Council - Jan 20, 2026 · 1:44:05 →Expressed strong opposition to the proposed CBP camera lease, citing privacy concerns and loss of local control.
City Council - Jan 20, 2026 · 2:53:50 →Asked the council to move item 11M forward on the agenda so public speakers would not have to stay late.
City Council - Jan 20, 2026 · 1:54:32 →Expressed adamantly opposition to the marine surveillance system lease, citing privacy violations.
City Council - Jan 20, 2026 · 8:32:34 →Argued that the surveillance camera lease is an unnecessary slippery slope leading to a loss of civil liberties.
City Council - Jan 20, 2026 · 6:44:35 →Urged the council to reject the surveillance lease, expressing distrust in federal agencies.
City Council - Jan 20, 2026 · 6:47:49 →