Zoning

Surface Mining and Land Reclamation Ordinance Update

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (10)Concerned (3)

At a glance

Public comments
15
Last 30 days
15

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 20, 2026.

Public comments (15)

OpposedAdrian FieldOct 20, 2026

Urged the board to vote no on the mining ordinance, stating that public outreach was poor and the proposal reduces environmental protections.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — October 20, 2026 · 33:30 →
OpposedPauline PisanoOct 20, 2026

Opposed public funds going to private companies and criticized the vague language and lack of outreach regarding the mining ordinance.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — October 20, 2026 · 42:47 →
OpposedErin GatlinOct 20, 2026

Expressed concern that the mining ordinance exempts federal land projects from adequate CEQA review and requested more public meetings.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — October 20, 2026 · 1:11:03 →
ConcernedSeda EvansOct 20, 2026

Thanked the board for listening and asked where supervisors stand on allowing mining companies into gateway communities near national parks.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — October 20, 2026 · 1:10:43 →
OpposedVandem AltschulerOct 20, 2026

Asked detailed legal questions about the mining ordinance exemptions and criticized the lack of direct community consultation.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — October 20, 2026 · 1:14:32 →
ConcernedBeth SheffieldOct 20, 2026

Noted the challenges of digesting complex mining ordinance proposals and urged the board not to pass it without clear protections for Wonder Valley.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — October 20, 2026 · 1:18:30 →
OpposedMargaret OstendorfOct 20, 2026

Disputed staff's claim that a meeting with Friends of Wonder Valley was outreach about the ordinance, noting it was about other community issues.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — October 20, 2026 · 1:20:15 →
MixedPat FlanaganOct 20, 2026

Supported recent CEQA and reclamation plan clarifications in the mining ordinance but requested initial studies and updated state MOUs.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — October 20, 2026 · 1:25:39 →
OpposedGail NietoOct 20, 2026

Expressed concern over CEQA exemptions in the mining ordinance and urged the board to protect air, water, and infrastructure.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — October 20, 2026 · 1:27:44 →
OpposedMelissa ManningOct 20, 2026

Criticized land use services for inadequate outreach in Wrightwood regarding the mining ordinance and Lone Pine Quarry.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — October 20, 2026 · 1:29:09 →
OpposedMartin OstendorfOct 20, 2026

Called for true community consultation rather than relying on FAQs and noted the vast proportion of desert land in the county.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — October 20, 2026 · 1:29:01 →
OpposedStacey SoleyOct 20, 2026

Requested genuine partnership and communication with rural desert residents regarding local land use decisions.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — October 20, 2026 · 1:33:33 →
ConcernedHenry JosephsbergOct 20, 2026

Pointed out drafting flaws regarding retroactive recognition of vested mining rights and abandonment criteria in the proposed ordinance.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — October 20, 2026 · 1:36:12 →
SupportiveMason OsgoodOct 20, 2026

Expressed appreciation for clarifications ensuring CEQA compliance and reclamation plans on federal lands, while urging continued community engagement.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — October 20, 2026 · 1:38:03 →
OpposedJohn VikanderOct 20, 2026

Requested tabling the vote on the mining ordinance to allow more time for public education, transparency, and input regarding dormant mines.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — October 20, 2026 · 1:40:05 →