Development

Proposed Lone Pine Canyon Quarry Development

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (13)

At a glance

Public comments
14
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 5, 2026.

Public comments (14)

SupportiveRussell DrewMay 5, 2026

Thanked Supervisor Cook and staff for repairing Lone Pine Canyon Road after flooding and noted coordination with land use services regarding the proposed quarry.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — May 5, 2026 · 1:57:21 →
OpposedCarol PettigrewMay 5, 2026

Voiced serious concerns about the negative impacts of the proposed quarry on local air quality, water, noise, and traffic.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — May 5, 2026 · 1:59:44 →
OpposedLinda DrewMay 5, 2026

Highlighted health hazards associated with calcium carbonate dust and asbestos from mining operations in Lone Pine Canyon.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — May 5, 2026 · 1:59:44 →
OpposedMelissa ManningMay 5, 2026

Discussed the inadequacy of the CEQA review, wildlife impacts, and the damage heavy haul trucks would cause to newly repaired Lone Pine Canyon Road.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — May 5, 2026 · 2:02:11 →
OpposedCheryl DerrickMay 5, 2026

Expressed opposition to the quarry and its disruptive impact on mountain communities.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — May 5, 2026 · 2:04:04 →
OpposedRobert KegelMay 5, 2026

Noted the presence of significant Native American archaeological sites on Indian Springs Ranch and warned against violating historical preservation laws.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — May 5, 2026 · 2:04:37 →
OpposedAndrew FirmMay 5, 2026

Detailed procedural defects in public noticing, improper project segmentation under CEQA, and requested a 60-day extension of the public comment period.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — May 5, 2026 · 2:05:18 →
OpposedJamie CarperMay 5, 2026

Challenged the legal validity of relying on historical vested mining rights to permit a modern industrial open-pit quarry.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — May 5, 2026 · 2:07:26 →
OpposedLindsay FaubMay 5, 2026

Stressed the lack of comprehensive environmental review, threats to sensitive wildlife, and severe air quality impacts for Wrightwood residents.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — May 5, 2026 · 2:09:30 →
OpposedDebbie LopezMay 5, 2026

Expressed deep concern over the destruction of indigenous archaeological sites and the blockage of emergency evacuation routes in Wrightwood.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — May 5, 2026 · 2:11:38 →
OpposedDaniel CrowleyMay 5, 2026

Expressed surprise at the sudden announcement of the quarry and asked the board to pause approvals to allow thorough community review.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — May 5, 2026 · 2:13:12 →
OpposedChad KeelMay 5, 2026

Urged Supervisor Cook to uphold his oath of office to protect local communities and heritage from foreign mineral exploitation.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — May 5, 2026 · 2:15:55 →
OpposedJill Carlton-PayneMay 5, 2026

Spoke on behalf of the Timberline Lions Club regarding environmental harms, water depletion, and road damage from the proposed quarry.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — May 5, 2026 · 2:19:37 →
OpposedKathleen MitchellMay 5, 2026

Warned about the seismic risks of drilling and mining along the active San Andreas Fault in Wrightwood.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — May 5, 2026 · 2:21:12 →