County Service Area Water and Sanitation Rate Adjustments
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 9, 2026.
Public comments (9)
Opposed the proposed water rate increase in Oak Hills, citing hardships for fixed-income residents and requesting better notice delivery.
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — June 9, 2026 · 56:32 →Stated opposition to the steep water rate increases in Oak Hills and questioned the necessity and funding sources.
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — June 9, 2026 · 59:31 →Expressed concern over the magnitude of utility rate hikes for seniors on fixed incomes.
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — June 9, 2026 · 56:15 →Reported collecting over 550 protest letters in Oak Hills and noted widespread lack of awareness regarding Prop 218 notices.
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — June 9, 2026 · 1:02:15 →Protested sewer rate increases in Lucerne Valley (Fontiskin), comparing costs unfavorably to neighboring Big Bear systems.
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — June 9, 2026 · 1:06:51 →Objected to sewer rate increases in Fontiskin on behalf of retired residents on fixed incomes.
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — June 9, 2026 · 1:06:53 →Argued that the Oak Hills Prop 218 notice process had legal deficiencies, including translation omissions and website posting errors.
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — June 9, 2026 · 1:09:49 →Expressed gratitude for the Prop 218 process and Lytle Creek residents' ability to successfully protest rate hikes.
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — June 9, 2026 · 1:45:11 →Offered engineering and technical expertise from Lytle Creek residents to help inspect and maintain the local sewer facility.
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting — June 9, 2026 · 1:45:17 →