University Hills development
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
University Hills development and hang-glider access→At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 6, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Representing SAFER, opposed the project and demanded a full updated environmental review over wildlife, air quality and climate impacts.
CLOSED SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL - May 6, 2026 · 1:20:54 →Concerned about dissolving the development agreement and losing negotiated community benefits.
CLOSED SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL - May 6, 2026 · 1:24:02 →Raised concerns about building near the fault line, wildlife, and climate risk; requested better public information on planned developments.
CLOSED SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL - May 6, 2026 · 3:24:18 →President of Crestline Soaring Society; supported the project with conditions to protect hang-glider landing safety.
CLOSED SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL - May 6, 2026 · 1:28:58 →A San Bernardino resident praised the density reduction, asked about first-time homebuyer affordability given million-dollar pricing, urged promotion of the air park as a city attraction, and supported working with the hang gliders.
Planning Commission - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:06:00 →An adjacent resident flagged that Devil's Canyon Road is water-district owned and two-lane, raised fire evacuation and power-shutoff water pump concerns, high insurance costs, wildlife, and possible landlocked access issues.
Planning Commission - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:09:52 →