California Record
San Bernardino
Development

Cannabis permit relocation (Item 4)

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Opposed (3)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 17, 2026.

Public comments (5)

OpposedDelores ArmsteadJun 17, 2026

Said the Westside is already saturated with liquor stores and pot shops and urged the council to support businesses that uplift the community.

CLOSED SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL - Jun 17, 2026 · 1:50:10 →
OpposedKim CalvinJun 17, 2026

Said a dispensary conflicts with the Sixth Ward's desire for higher-quality commercial development near senior housing and churches.

CLOSED SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL - Jun 17, 2026 · 4:58:02 →
OpposedAl PalazzoJun 17, 2026

An emotional longtime resident said the site is a block from his home, near historic properties, a hospital, and churches — and urged the city to tell residents they deserve better.

CLOSED SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL - Jun 17, 2026 · 3:32:31 →
SupportiveTonya SmithJun 17, 2026

Supported the dispensary, saying a well-regulated cannabis industry generates tax revenue for schools, public safety, and revitalizing vacant storefronts.

CLOSED SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL - Jun 17, 2026 · 3:35:01 →
SupportiveRyan OganicianJun 17, 2026

The OG Ventures co-owner (during reopened hearing) explained the Airport Drive site was not viable, touted Higher Ground's compliance and tax contributions, and promised union jobs and property investment.

CLOSED SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL - Jun 17, 2026 · 3:56:08 →