Garvey Avenue bus lane
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 8, 2026.
Public comments (5)
Said she can't understand why the project is being pushed through, warned businesses will fail, criticized closed-door meetings, and suggested buses use signal synchronization like emergency vehicles.
City Council and Traffic Commission Joint (Special) - Sep 8, 2026 · 4:40 →Opposed the project; said the actual traffic studies weren't publicly available, warned of cut-through traffic on Hellman and Emerson, worried about business impacts, and asked for mitigation for north-south corridors.
City Council and Traffic Commission Joint (Special) - Sep 8, 2026 · 5:02 →Local businessman who warned of liability lawsuits (citing two pending suits against Metro), described fighting his way in and out of his driveway and having customers unable to enter his property, and left the council 26 written reasons to reject the project.
City Council and Traffic Commission Joint (Special) - Sep 8, 2026 · 8:33 →Written comment read into the record: posed six questions on bus frequency, ridership counts, business surveys, school drop-offs, un-signalized north-south streets, and Edison-area congestion.
City Council and Traffic Commission Joint (Special) - Sep 8, 2026 · 12:51 →Written comment read into the record: longtime resident who noted a similar plan was voted down before as infeasible; asked about travel times, law enforcement funding, bus counts, business impacts, and what Rosemead gains.
City Council and Traffic Commission Joint (Special) - Sep 8, 2026 · 14:18 →