Taxes Budget

City attorney hire

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
2
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 16, 2026.

Public comments (5)

ConcernedAurora ChavezJun 16, 2026

Welcomed the new city attorney hire but asked for better legal vetting of agenda items before they cause lawsuits, and for the new attorney to meet the public in the evening session.

City Council — June 16, 2026 · 2:51:49 →
OpposedKeith NelsonJun 16, 2026

Urged a no vote on waiving the Sunshine Ordinance, calling the emergency justification phony and demanding the contract be continued to an evening session with full public review.

City Council — June 16, 2026 · 1:21:50 →
OpposedJason HunterJun 16, 2026

Cited the troubled history of recent city attorneys (fired or sued) and warned the contract terms — big severance, termination restrictions — repeat past mistakes.

City Council — June 16, 2026 · 1:25:00 →
NeutralAurora ChavezJun 16, 2026

In chambers, asked that the new city attorney be introduced to the public at the 6:15 evening session so everyone can meet him and weigh in.

City Council — June 16, 2026 · 2:51:49 →
MixedMelissa McKeeJun 16, 2026

Supported hiring James Johnson given his strong reputation and ABA-accredited degree, but flagged the rushed process and the broader pattern of costly attorney departures and litigation.

City Council — June 16, 2026 · 1:41:01 →