Rezone of 0 Roselle Avenue pasture

Lives adjacent to the parcel; argued MID ownership means the site isn't truly available, criticized reliance on a 1997 environmental analysis, and urged denial or delay.

Opposed forcing a landowner to rezone; asked the city to look at other areas and warned wastewater capacity can't handle 700 more homes.

Her backyard faces the property; she received no mailed notice and fears losing privacy if apartments are built, citing terrible traffic at Glowe and Roselle.

Walks her grandkids to the pasture; asked how 40 homes could fit on an acre and objected to high-density zoning there.

Said he and his wife were told the land had MID utilities and would never be developed and they hoped for a park; called the process rushed.

Lives directly across from the animals; questioned the need given Crossroads West's new homes, park and school, and asked that the site be removed forever.

The longtime tenant grazing the cattle thanked the community for its support and said he'd hate to see the pasture go.

A farmer who chose his home for the quiet dead-end street; asked the Commission to reconsider and noted another option exists.

Opposed the whole item, saying the power line constraints mean only a handful of homes could fit and relocation would be costly.