Water Utilities

Recycled water project (Item 10.1)

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (3)Concerned (2)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jan 13, 2026.

Public comments (5)

OpposedRich HolmerJan 13, 2026

Called spending on more consultants before the feasibility study is done a 'sunk cost fallacy' and opposed the item.

City Council / Local Redevelopment Authority - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:31:48 →
ConcernedMichael ChristieJan 13, 2026

Asked about plant capacity amid recent rains and whether the city is pressing Sacramento for funding help.

City Council / Local Redevelopment Authority - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:29:20 →
OpposedDiego HernandezJan 13, 2026

Argued the same consultants' 2022 estimate failed and that value engineering is throwing good money after bad on an unaffordable project.

City Council / Local Redevelopment Authority - Jan 13, 2026 · 47:55 →
OpposedJami AggersJan 13, 2026

On Zoom, questioned why two consultants are needed and why the work can't wait until the feasibility study narrows the options.

City Council / Local Redevelopment Authority - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:34:30 →
ConcernedUnidentified ResidentJan 13, 2026

A Zoom caller asked how the tertiary plant rates satisfy Proposition 218's property-related requirement.

City Council / Local Redevelopment Authority - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:38:30 →