Recycled water project (Item 10.1)
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Regional Recycled Water Project spending→At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jan 13, 2026.
Public comments (5)
Called spending on more consultants before the feasibility study is done a 'sunk cost fallacy' and opposed the item.
City Council / Local Redevelopment Authority - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:31:48 →Asked about plant capacity amid recent rains and whether the city is pressing Sacramento for funding help.
City Council / Local Redevelopment Authority - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:29:20 →Argued the same consultants' 2022 estimate failed and that value engineering is throwing good money after bad on an unaffordable project.
City Council / Local Redevelopment Authority - Jan 13, 2026 · 47:55 →On Zoom, questioned why two consultants are needed and why the work can't wait until the feasibility study narrows the options.
City Council / Local Redevelopment Authority - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:34:30 →A Zoom caller asked how the tertiary plant rates satisfy Proposition 218's property-related requirement.
City Council / Local Redevelopment Authority - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:38:30 →