Third Geologic Hazard Abatement District
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Possible Third Geologic Hazard Abatement District→At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 7, 2026.
Public comments (6)
The Klondike Canyon commission chairman supports forming a third GHAD but wants the three districts kept separate, citing conflicts of interest and crediting deep dewatering wells with stopping the Klondike slide in October 2024.
City Council Meeting - Jul 7, 2026 · 3:09:56 →Speaking for ACLAD, he also supports a third district but is reluctant to fold ACLAD into a single consolidated district because resident volunteers know their own slide best.
City Council Meeting - Jul 7, 2026 · 5:15:50 →A Portuguese Bend resident, she opposes a consolidated district, wants decisions made by people who live there, and questioned whether the district map correctly includes PV Drive South in ACLAD.
City Council Meeting - Jul 7, 2026 · 5:20:06 →She argues the largest landslide in North America shouldn't be run by volunteers, points to Malibu's Big Rock Mesa precedent, and warns the city's litigation-counsel advice is leading it down the wrong road.
City Council Meeting - Jul 7, 2026 · 5:23:30 →He says the city has outspent the volunteer districts ten-to-one on the landslide, so professional management in one unified district makes financial sense, and he wants the legal recommendation backed with documentation.
City Council Meeting - Jul 7, 2026 · 5:27:25 →Via Zoom, he supports at least investigating a single unified GHAD, saying structure matters for the next 50 years and the track record of two independent districts hasn't been good.
City Council Meeting - Jul 7, 2026 · 3:22:55 →