Site plan review appeal — radon equipment

The appellant argued the approval is 'anti-resident,' saying the developer installed a hazardous gas exhaust without permits, submitted false plans, and violated mechanical code clearances; he urged the commission to revoke the approval under Section 17.86.060.

The applicant said the survey was done by a licensed California surveyor, the CMC 502.2 clearances don't apply to single-family homes, and the system meets all California and EPA requirements with no modifications needed.

The new property owner said her family bought the home partly for the radon system, that no evidence shows the emissions are dangerous, and asked the commission to stick to the narrow screening question before it.

Signed up to speak but was the husband of Sylvia Chu and yielded his time, saying only 'hi' before the rebuttal phase began.