Boundary Adjustment Application 25-0002
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 5, 2026.
Public comments (5)
The appellant argued the adjustment preserves wetlands and creates a trail plus new property tax revenue, with no rezoning or added density, and offered to record the open space easement as a condition of approval.
City Council - May 5, 2026 · 22:34 →Asked whether the change opens the door to more homes and worried about landslides on Cree Drive and what happens if the project is abandoned.
City Council - May 5, 2026 · 34:00 →A 20-year Ahwahnee Way resident said two homes would be fine but feared subdivision of the southern canyon area on unstable slopes.
City Council - May 5, 2026 · 35:44 →Echoed the denial findings and raised RRA zoning protections, slope stability, drainage near Starridge Park, and doubts about the applicant's true intentions.
City Council - May 5, 2026 · 37:32 →A neutral Cree Drive resident asked whether the decision affects the southern parcel and whether development could occur there affecting his canyon view.
City Council - May 5, 2026 · 40:44 →