California Record
Pittsburg
Development

Golf Course Road Data Center

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (3)

At a glance

Public comments
3
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 1, 2026.

Public comments (3)

OpposedChristin KollicoJun 1, 2026

Asked the council to put the data center on a future agenda; raised recycled-water limits, energy use equal to all Pittsburg homes, rising utility costs, noise/infrasound health effects, and requested public dashboards and full assessments before phases two and three.

City Council - Jun 1, 2026 · 58:17 →
OpposedMark DavyJun 1, 2026

Longtime resident urged reconsideration of phase one approval and a halt to phases two and three, citing health evidence, plummeting home values, higher energy costs, fire risk in 110-degree summers, and proximity to a junior high school.

City Council - Jun 1, 2026 · 1:02:02 →
OpposedJudy DujakJun 1, 2026

Emotional longtime resident and grandmother said the data center should never have been approved near homes, schools, parks and churches, citing noise, vibration, emissions, light and property value damage, and asked the council to stop it.

City Council - Jun 1, 2026 · 1:04:17 →