California Record
Petaluma
Public Safety

Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Program and Flock Contract

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (16)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
17
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Feb 25, 2026.

Public comments (17)

OpposedRobin RileyFeb 25, 2026

Expressed deep concern regarding data sharing with out-of-state agencies and federal intelligence centers, urging the committee to recommend terminating the Flock contract.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 24:01 →
OpposedEric LelandFeb 25, 2026

Noted that other California cities like Mountain View have removed Flock cameras, and asked the committee to recommend contract cancellation.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 30:04 →
OpposedAutumn CruzFeb 25, 2026

Urged the committee to remove Flock cameras from Petaluma due to inherent security vulnerabilities in cloud surveillance networks.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 32:32 →
OpposedAlex MensingFeb 25, 2026

Shared past experiences with federal surveillance during activist work and urged the committee to recommend canceling the Flock contract.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 32:46 →
OpposedIsaac RussoFeb 25, 2026

Cited white papers detailing security vulnerabilities in Flock cameras and urged the committee to recommend removing all units.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 34:14 →
OpposedRebecca CarpenterFeb 25, 2026

Expressed distrust of federal agencies and asked the committee to prioritize freedom over safety by recommending contract cancellation.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 35:48 →
OpposedNicholas HugginsFeb 25, 2026

Highlighted technical vulnerabilities, public record disclosure risks, and accuracy issues associated with AI-driven license plate readers.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 37:29 →
OpposedLuigi PetredovFeb 25, 2026

Warned against ubiquitous surveillance networks and their potential misuse by immigration and law enforcement authorities.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 41:56 →
OpposedRavel MastFeb 25, 2026

Requested that the committee recommend removing Flock cameras, terminating the contract, and adopting a local surveillance ordinance.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 42:22 →
OpposedMichael TidoneFeb 25, 2026

Expressed concern that surveillance tools could be used to chill First Amendment activities and protest participation.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 46:00 →
OpposedBruce HalliwellFeb 25, 2026

Questioned whether local authorities would resist federal overreach if data were demanded without a warrant.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 47:20 →
OpposedPatrick LeperFeb 25, 2026

Recommended turning off the cameras when federal agencies operate in town if contracts cannot be canceled.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 47:46 →
OpposedForum GalaFeb 25, 2026

Warned that tech companies eventually prioritize data aggregation and monetization over public utility, raising massive safety concerns.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 51:13 →
ConcernedNina ZitoFeb 25, 2026

Asked for specific data regarding prosecution rates and how active investigations are defined within the ALPR framework.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 57:51 →
OpposedJason SweeneyFeb 25, 2026

Argued that cloud-based data cannot be fully secured and urged the council to cancel the Flock program entirely.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 55:25 →
OpposedElenaFeb 25, 2026

Stated that ALPR cameras function as mass surveillance tools that threaten civil rights and assist federal immigration enforcement.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 57:41 →
OpposedUnidentified ResidentFeb 25, 2026

Noted that cities like Eureka and Santa Cruz are evaluating contract terminations and urged Petaluma to follow suit.

Public Safety Advisory Committee Meeting - Feb 25, 2026 · 1:36:30 →