PUSD tree removal
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Tree protection ordinance and PUSD tree removal→At a glance
- Public comments
- 15
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 13, 2026.
Public comments (17)
Thanked the council for enforcing the tree protection ordinance against the school district and asked for more dialogue and transparency with the school board.
City Council Meeting: - Jul 13, 2026 · 15:05 →Described century-old trees tagged for removal near the district administration building and thanked the city for intervening.
City Council Meeting: - Jul 13, 2026 · 16:01 →Applauded the city for upholding the tree protection ordinance and urged maximum penalties and protection plans for work near protected trees.
City Council Meeting: - Jul 13, 2026 · 20:01 →Raised safety concerns about cherry-picker work near student protesters despite a city stop-work notice and asked the mayor to convene all parties.
City Council Meeting: - Jul 13, 2026 · 24:05 →A speech and language therapist thanked the council for supporting the tree protection ordinance, saying children need more trees, not fewer.
City Council Meeting: - Jul 13, 2026 · 26:04 →Said the soil testing justifying tree removal is two seasons outdated and urged the council to examine Measure I and J accountability language.
City Council Meeting: - Jul 13, 2026 · 26:43 →Raised safety concerns about tree removal equipment operating near sit-in protesters despite a stop-work notice; asked the mayor to convene all parties.
City Council Meeting: (Audio Description) - Jul 13, 2026 · 24:07 →Urban Forestry Advisory Committee member said PUSD is improperly bypassing the tree ordinance to remove 193 healthy trees, since the emergency exemption only applies to hazardous trees.
City Council Meeting: - Jun 15, 2026 · 31:12 →District 2 resident and EAC member urged the council to halt the tree removals until there is transparent information, noting better soil remediation methods exist.
City Council Meeting: - Jun 15, 2026 · 33:02 →Former PUSD student and UFAC member said DTSC doesn't require tree removal, cited successful Altadena remediation preserving trees, and asked the council to scrutinize the emergency exemption.
City Council Meeting: - Jun 15, 2026 · 34:55 →A 17-year-old who spent eight hours sitting in an oak tree marked for removal asked the council to save the trees.
City Council Meeting: - Jun 15, 2026 · 36:26 →Paloma's mother, a homeowner and physician, described being referred between the state and PUSD and begged the council to have the planning department and city attorney review the exemption.
City Council Meeting: - Jun 15, 2026 · 37:28 →An Urban Forestry Advisory Committee member said PUSD is removing 193 healthy trees without required permits, misusing the hazardous-tree emergency exemption, and asked the council to enforce the tree ordinance.
City Council Meeting: (Audio Description) - Jun 15, 2026 · 31:12 →A District 2 resident urged the council to halt the tree removals until there's transparent information, noting some trees are over a century old and better soil remediation methods exist.
City Council Meeting: (Audio Description) - Jun 15, 2026 · 33:02 →Said DTSC isn't requiring tree removal, cited successful tree-preserving remediation in Altadena, and asked the council to scrutinize the emergency exemption and require normal permitting.
City Council Meeting: (Audio Description) - Jun 15, 2026 · 34:55 →A 17-year-old who spent eight hours sitting in an oak tree marked for removal asked the council to spare the trees.
City Council Meeting: (Audio Description) - Jun 15, 2026 · 36:26 →Paloma's mother, a homeowner and physician, described being bounced between the state and PUSD and begged the council to have planning and the city attorney review the district's submissions.
City Council Meeting: (Audio Description) - Jun 15, 2026 · 37:29 →